<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Cernam Online Evidence - Latest Comments</title><link>http://cernam.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://cernam.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 05:55:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google+, the latest social network and newest source of evidence</title><link>http://www.cernam.com/index.php/online-evidence/google-the-latest-social-network-and-newest-source-of-evidence/#comment-245736955</link><description>&lt;p&gt;According to Lifehacker, Google+ invites are open again - &lt;a href="http://lifehacker.com/5819218/google%252B-invites-are-open-again" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://lifehacker.com/5819218/google%252B-invites-are-open-again"&gt;http://lifehacker.com/58192...&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karen Reilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 05:55:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google+, the latest social network and newest source of evidence</title><link>http://www.cernam.com/index.php/online-evidence/google-the-latest-social-network-and-newest-source-of-evidence/#comment-245158911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing our post about Google+ and online evidence @infosecurityire @fpmulder @jjoerlemans @brianhonan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karen Reilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:26:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cernam Seminar: Facebook&amp;#039;s New Messages &amp;amp; Digital Evidence</title><link>http://www.cernam.com/index.php/cernam-updates/cernam-seminar-facebooks-new-messages-digital-evidence/#comment-231759415</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A big thanks to everyone who attended our seminar yesterday. Great to see that so many people are interested in the new system. Feel free to contact us if you have any questions. &lt;br&gt;Thanks for all the retweets about the event too. Karen&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karen Reilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:26:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple iCloud – Cloud Computing for your Grandparents</title><link>http://www.cernam.com/index.php/online-evidence/apple-icloud-cloud-computing-for-your-grandparents/#comment-222649896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But most companies are just moving over to i-phones to provide their "execs~" with street cred!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chrisataylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:38:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Success of Box.net points to eDiscovery problems ahead</title><link>http://www.cernam.com/index.php/web-2-0/success-of-box-net-points-to-ediscovery-problems-ahead/#comment-193827167</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since this piece was written one of &lt;a href="http://Box.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Box.net"&gt;Box.net&lt;/a&gt;'s competitors, Dropbox, has announced that they added 21 million new users between January 2010 and April 2011, further demonstrating the huge interest in online collaboration and storage services. For more see &lt;a href="http://blogs.forbes.com/tomiogeron/2011/04/18/dropbox-ramping-up-towards-mainstream/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.forbes.com/tomiogeron/2011/04/18/dropbox-ramping-up-towards-mainstream/"&gt;http://blogs.forbes.com/tom...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Owen O'Connor</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:21:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Emails as evidence in court</title><link>http://www.cernam.com/index.php/online-evidence/emails-as-evidence-in-court/#comment-141858081</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment Eoin. This is just one example of work related information being sent through employees personal email accounts. We would argue that this kind of conduct is commonplace and is occurring a lot more in the workplace than employers might be aware of.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karen Reilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 04:38:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Emails as evidence in court</title><link>http://www.cernam.com/index.php/online-evidence/emails-as-evidence-in-court/#comment-141850328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually I think that the compensation was actually paid by HP as by the time the judgement was actually registered, EDS as a corporate entity had ceased to exist. Needless to say HP has very strict rules about ethics in sales and the use of non corporate email or communication channels in the conduct of business is not permitted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eoin Fleming</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 03:33:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>